PARTICIPANT ADJUSTED MEDAL COUNTS: A NOTE ON EQUITY AND INCLUSIVENESS APPROACH TO TOKYO OLYMPIC

Ik-Whan Kwon, Sung-Ho Kim

Abstract


A lack of standard reporting systems on Olympic medal counts and subsequent rankings raises confusion among spectators. Ranking, based on inconsistent measures by IOC and other reporting organizations, has hampered scholarly investigations in search for objective, fair and inclusive ranking system based on the IOC spirit. This paper attempts to incorporate two additional variables into ranking system, size of participants and wealth of nations. When these two variables are incorporated into the statistical models, different outcomes emerged from what IOC and other organizations reported. Small countries like Bermuda and Kyrgyzstan emerged as strong contenders in the Olympic Games. This approach appears to have addressed fairness and inclusive issues in Olympic Games.

Keywords: IOC, Inclusiveness, Equity, Fibonacci system, adjusted medal counts, Weighed total medals, adjusted medal counts, Friedman’s rank order test.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ball, D. W., (1972). “Olympic Games Competition: Structural Correlates of National Success,” International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 15: 186-200

Bernard, A. B., and Busse, M. R. (2004). Who wins the Olympic games: Economic resources and medal total? Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1); 413-417.

Forrest, D., McHale, I. G., Sanz, I., and Tena, J.D. (2015). Chapter 10: Determinants of national medals totals at the summer Olympic Games: an analysis disaggregated by sport.

Ed by Placido Rodrigues, Stefan Kesenne and Rund Koning, May 29. Edwards Elgar Publishing.

Grimes, A.R., Kelly W. J., and Rubin, P.H. (1974). A socioeconomic model of national Olympic Performance. Social Science Quarterly, 55; 777-783.

Johnson, D. K. N., and Ali, A., “Coming to Play or Coming to Win: Participation and Success at the Olympic Games,” Wellesley College mimeo (2000).

Klein, Jeff (2008). The Medal Rankings: Which country leads the Olympics? The New York Times, August 23.

Levine, E., “Why Do Countries Win Olympic Medals? Some Structural Correlates of Olympic Games Success: 1972,” Sociology and Social Science Research, 588 (1974), 353-360

Müller, Martin. Wolfe, Sven Daniel, Gaffney, Christopher, Gogishvili, David, Hug, Miriam and Leick, Annick (2021). An evaluation of the sustainability of the Olympic Games. Nature Sustainability | VOL 4:340–348.

Putt, Graeme (2013). National Performance Versus Population at the Olympic Games: A Methodology for Determining Elite Performers. International Journal of Sports Science, 3(3):74-80.

Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. (2012). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.

Wade, S. and Yamaguchi, M. (2019). Tokyo Olympics costs $12.6B; audit report says much more. AP NEWS. https://apnews.com/ eb6d9e318b4b95f7e53cd1b617dce123


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Journal of Business and Economics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Based on a work at http://ijbe.ielas.org

Copyright © 2016-2021 International Journal of Business and Economics (IJBE)

ISSN (online) 2545-4137

Disclaimer: Articles on International Journal of Business and Economics (IJBE) have been previewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication. The Journal, Chief Editor and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any. It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.